About Me

Name: Thespis
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

The Most Philosophically Vacant Election of My Lifetime

 

The post election political situation in Washington DC and in Columbus, Ohio has been more interesting than the dull and lackluster campaign season. Usually, when one party wins a landslide in an election, the platform of the elected party appears on the horizon as the winds of change bring in the man on the white horse. Since today’s democrats did not put forth any unified campaign positions, and are generally at war with each other (witness the Murtha debacle of this past week in the House of Representatives), there is no clear direction for the democrats to pursue as they now must share power and finish their incessant complaining about everything. The shrill tones of their daily grumbling have sounded one too many futile tone clusters of obnoxious opposition. It seems that these democrats may not know how to share power.

Senator Elizabeth Dole of North Carolina summed up the Iraqi War situation on the Sunday prior to the election when she said that the “democrats appear to be content with losing in Iraq.” While no one with any political savvy thinks that the voters endorsed the Pelosi/Murtha “cut and run” strategy, Pelosi vigorously promoted Murtha as her first salvo in getting America out of Iraq immediately. Pelosi says we are losing. She is content with losing. Surely, rationale minds in the democrat party will reach the conclusion that the United States of America can not leave Iraq to the terrorists and allow fascism to spread over the entire Middle East.

President Bush has said that the only way we can lose is to not finish the job. Surely, even liberals must realize that American must finish the job. The United States must finish the mission in Iraq.

As the democrats scramble to figure out what issues they won on, nothing will happen in Washington. Democrats will likely turn on each other, and wait to see what direction the Hilary wind blows.

In Columbus, it will be in interesting to see if Ted Strickland can govern on the mandate to get rid of every republican-especially Bob Taft. My guess is that most of the liberal interest groups will be very disappointed in Strickland’s ability to enact any of the socialist, leftist agenda they think that he was elected on.

In the next eight to twelve months, liberal gloating will turn into liberal drivel, confusion, bitterness, and a long list of liberal complaints about everything. These liberals don’t know how to lead. I’ve heard that they are counting on meeting Jack, Nancy, Ned, and Sherrod in Okinawa for a drink as soon as the troops are re-deployed there. If the troops never make it, what will these liberal elitists think of their own leadership? Perhaps the house will follow the moonbat of the month, Dennis Kucinich in stripping the troops of their funding now.

The warring democrats don’t have long to finally develop a platform (besides minimum wage increases and immigrant amnesty) to get party unity and make use of their victory. Watching them squirm as leadership is foist upon them will be the best game in town for the next six months.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jimmy Carter Quacks Again

There should be a sunset clause on the publication of comments by former Presidents who embarrass the nation. Depending on the failure rate of a presidency, or after a couple of dozen royal screw-ups, the former President should have no forum from which to spout his folly. When Ronald Reagan skunked Jimmy Carter in November, 1980, the nation breathed collective sigh of relief as we believed we were finished being lectured by the king of malaise. Jimmy Carter, the person whose method of fighting the cold war was to tell the communists that we would not attend the Olympics, the man who perfected the misery index, and the real accident of the Watergate history should be exposed for his sheer silliness.

The public is weary of hearing from the mainstream elite press that Jimmy Carter is the best former President in our nation’s history. Jimmy Carter is more dangerous now than when he was in The White House. While in the White House he had advisors who could partially protect him from his own stupidity. Along with many other Americans, I am ashamed of Jimmy Carter, and the efforts of a complicit liberal press to rehabilitate Mr. Carter will not be successful.

Mr. Carter has opened his mouth again, and while he is bashing President Bush, Carter succeeds in embarrassing himself and has given aid and comfort to the enemy once again. There has been a long standing policy that Former Presidents provide their critiques of current policies in private. Mr. Carter has never accommodated this unwritten rule. Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter have always the lacked the class, wisdom, wisdom, good judgment, and dignity to lead our nation in any meaningful manner. The following are three of the ludicrous points made by Mr. Carter.

• President Bush has pursued an "erroneous policy" that has fostered violence in the Middle East, said former President Jimmy Carter, who brokered the historic Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt. "In my opinion, maybe the worst ally Israel has had in Washington has been the George W. Bush administration, which hasn't worked to bring a permanent peace to Israel," Carter said Friday during a stop in West Michigan.

• "It depends on whether world opinion is strong enough to get the administration to change its erroneous policy, which has been to encourage the continuation of attacks on both sides."

• "In my opinion, we should make every effort now to withdraw American troops from Iraq," he said. "I would say certainly begin a major withdrawal no later than the end of this year."

The guys at Powerline have extensive research on the disastrous former presidency of Jimmy Carter. They state the ideas extremely well, and provide a compelling indictment of Mr. Carter’s worth as a statesman in the post September 11 political climate.

Jimmy Carter is a disgrace. We've said so before, and we'll continue saying so as long as he merits the criticism. If you want to learn more, read Steven Hayward's book The Real Jimmy Carter. Carter panted after the Nobe Peace Prize for years, seeing it as a means of gaining official redemption for his humiliation at the hands of the voters in 1980. He lobbied quietly behind the scenes for years to get the prize, and finally met with success in 2002 when the left-wing Nobel Prize committee saw an opportunity to use Carter as a way of attacking President Bush and embarrassing the United States. The head of the Nobel Prize committee openly admitted that this was their motivation in selecting Carter. Any other ex-president would have refused to be a part of such an obvious anti-American intrigue, but not Jimmy. Here we should observe that Carter conceives himself much more as a citizen of the world than as a citizen of the United States, and I think it is highly revealing that Carter is most popular overseas in those nations that hate America the most, such as Syria, where they lined the streets cheering for Carter when he visited.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lost LaChanze

After a wonderful recent visit to Broadway where I discovered to my dismay that many stars are not playing a regular schedule of shows, I expressed outrage in several forums. While many fans of Broadway stars seem to have joined forces with Broadway Producers to keep this information from the public, The New York Post let loose today with a fabulous article, "Lost LaChanze." Michael Riedel expresses it in the leading paragraphs of his story.

A hiker in the Himalayas has a better chance of spotting a snow leopard than a theatergoer at "The Color Purple" has of seeing its Tony-winning star, LaChanze.


The actress, who got glowing reviews for her portrayal of the oppressed girl turned pants-making lesbian, Celie, hasn't given a full week's worth of performances since the awards show in June.

The week after the Tonys, she missed three out of eight performances, and now drops one or two shows a week.


WOW! It's hard to believe that this truthful article made it into the Post today. Although internet posters are outraged, at least the public will know that LaChanze will likely not be there if the pay $80, $112, $150, or $250 for their ticket. There needs to be more of a standard when stars are on the boards. Last week alone the following performers missed shows without any notice or formal announcement: Beth Leavel, John Lloyd Young, LaChanze, Lillias White, and Obba Babatunde. This irresponsible behavior qualifies for outrage of the week.

Footnote: Actor Wayne Brady seems to have an unfulfilled commitment to the Broadway Bound revival of THE WIZ at LaJolla Playhouse in San Diego. What's up with these divas of the theater world?

Another Footnote: Here are a couple of comments from a thread on Broadway World that is highlighted by a disscussion of this topic. Some of these postings are blunt, but accurate!

This whole thing is bulls**t.Why do you pursue a career in the theatre? To perform, to act, to inter-act with the cast and the audience.

To LaC, Donna M., and others, unless you have the flu or there is a death in the family, you get your ass onto the stage and WORK! There are hundreds/thousands of men and women dying to get a role in any show let alone a lead in a Bway musical.

There should be language in contracts that reduce the star's salary for each missed performance. Then we will see how many perfs are missed in future.

I know the board is littered with these types of posts, but I couldn't resist putting in my two cents (for what it's worth). First of all, I'm a high school teacher. If I missed two or three days of work each week, I wouldn't have my job for long. I also think my job is demanding. I deal with almost 100 teenagers everday and have found that this week my voice is shot. But I didn't miss work. Why must we always skirt the real issue? If performing is your "job" then you need to do whatever you need to do to make sure that you're at work as much as possible. When I go to see a show, I pay good money. I want the LaChanzes and Donna Murphys of the world to be on. Tell my why performing in a show is any more difficult than working in a factory, working as a teacher, or working as an administrative assistant? I know we all must take a day off every now and again. It just seems like certain performers do it way too much.

You are 1000% right.

My God, teachers, doctors, firemen, cops, construction workers, etc. Do they wake up in the morning and say "gee, I broke a nail, I am not going to work"? Hell no!

The truth is acting is a 'special' profession and all actors as well as people behind the scenes owe their livings to the public who sees them and the producers who sign their checks. I will not consider myself to live a less than fulfilled life if I stop seeing theatre. I go as a choice and if I have the money.

In return I expect to see the original cast; I have every right to a refund if the star is not there. Just like your students have the right to see you, not a substitute!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »